Compare Meta / Facebook Pixel by Nabu vs Aimerce First‑Party Pixel

Your request is being processed and will be delivered shortly. If you do not receive an email from Taranker within the next 5 minutes, please check your spam folder and mark it as "Not Spam" to ensure future emails reach your inbox.

Pros

Allows installation of multiple Facebook, Meta, and Instagram Pixels without manual theme changes
Avoids conversion tracking issues with server-side event tracking using the Conversion API
Bypasses iOS 14 restrictions for more accurate conversion tracking
Supports advanced matching on Facebook Pixel or Meta Pixel for better ad targeting
Tracks key Facebook events such as Purchase, Add to Cart, Begin Checkout
Provides detailed analytics for every Facebook pixel and event
Offers unlimited Facebook or Meta Pixels with unlimited conversion tracking
Easy 1-click setup without requiring manual code changes

Captures data lost to ad blockers, iOS updates, and browser tracking
Extends visitor tracking from 7 days (or 24 hours for ads) to a full year with Durable ID
Provides richer data on returning visitors and a complete customer journey
One-click integration with Klaviyo and Meta ads, improving ease of use
Server-side tracking enriches first-party data
Helps increase email campaign revenue and ad ROAS (Return on Ad Spend)
Improves identification of website traffic over time and across sessions
Enhances capabilities for sending cart abandonment emails via Klaviyo
Facilitates audience building with one-click Meta Event Manager integration
Supports a better understanding of customer behaviors with fully owned first-party data

Cons

May require understanding of conversion API and server-side tracking concepts for optimal use
Potential dependency on app functionality for accurate tracking, meaning any app issue might affect tracking data
Users with less technical knowledge might need additional support to fully utilize the app's capabilities
Not specified if there are any costs associated with the app or if it's entirely free

Implementation depends heavily on the compatibility and existing infrastructure of the website
Reliance on first-party data may require existing robust data management practices
Setup and configuration might be complex for those unfamiliar with server-side tracking
May involve additional costs for enterprises using advanced features or requiring premium support
Depends on external platforms (Klaviyo and Meta ads) for full utilization

Launched

Feb 26, 2024

Apr 18, 2024

Developer

Built by AdNabu Global, Inc.

Apps:

Average Rating:

4.8

Reviews:

1,715

Built by Aimerce

Apps:

Average Rating:

Reviews:

Make Your Choice

Try for Free More info View alternatives

Try for Free More info

Compare Meta / Facebook Pixel by Nabu vs Aimerce First‑Party Pixel

Meta / Facebook Pixel by Nabu

Aimerce First‑Party Pixel

Meta / Facebook Pixel by Nabu

Aimerce First‑Party Pixel

Rating

Rating

Pricing

Pricing

Features

Features

Screenshots

Screenshots

Send this compare to my inbox

Pros

Pros

Cons

Cons

Categories

Categories

Launched

Launched

Developer

Developer

Built by AdNabu Global, Inc.

Built by Aimerce

Make Your Choice

Make Your Choice